Following
the news about HMV’s administrative visitation I got to thinking about music,
rather a lot; I did a fair bit of listening, too. Then I got to thinking about listening and I remembered a
passage that I’d read from Theodor Adorno and Hanns Eisler’s book Composing for the Films. They argued
that the mechanical reproduction of music - and the catalytic effect it had on
the procession of style change - was systematic in rendering the relatively
attuned ear of the listener (or the modern consumer) ‘indolent’ and docile.
Accordingly,
the ear, and listening (to music), is historically bound up in an archaic
collectivity which suggests a kind of socially conditioned ear, an ear
intrinsically ill-disposed to change. However, the rapid commodification of art
beguiled the ear as it failed to keep up with the ceaseless drove of the
industrial age and its mercantile megaphone, the hit-machine. Unlike its actively discriminative neighbour, the eye,
the ear is a generally passive organ which, for Adorno and Eisler, accounts for
the rationalized artistic development of music in the western world as a
concerted effort to awake the ear from its supine slumber. That’s not to say it
is unable to distinguish difference, quite the contrary, but that under the
reified conditions of pop-culture it is increasingly likely to disagree with
the alternative and the new.
But
not just disagree; plainly disregard!
When Stravinsky's The Rite of Spring premiered at the Théâtre
des Champs-Élysées in Paris on the 29 May 1913 the ensuing riots would emblazon
the event into the history books forever more, illustrating that most abusive
of relationships between the public and ‘their’
music. Personally, I like this idea, from a historic perspective. The
prospect of such wild, bodily affections having been induced so by the ‘dreamy’
ear of the bourgeoisie shows a convulsive negotiation with the work of art all
but absent from the public sphere today. Moreover, the riots avowedly attested
to the artwork’s autonomy, as being something internally mediated, rather than
the diarrheic bowel movements of the economy.
Today,
the new exists (somewhat), but to the
immediate effect of its alienation. It isn’t rejected on any rational basis but
shunned out of popular favour/consideration by the exclusivity of mainstream
media; and although there has for
some time existed concurrent ‘alternative’ canons, if you like, the majority
have underwhelmed, albeit providing ample sustenance for the dilettante, or the
elusive ‘hipster’, as they sift through cyberspace leaving behind great hulks
of freshly outmoded tunez. Ok, let me
just dismount my hobby-horse for a moment or two.
We’ve
all heard somebody at a party or other blurt the evocation “music is like, better than sex!” which,
depending on what’s playing, may betray more about the individuals’ sex life
than the power of the music. But this analogy may infact be more consistent
with our listening habits than we think. In a recent article in The Atlantic Dan Slater provided a
summation of his new book Love in the
Time of Algorithms. He argued that the increase in techno-mediated dating
services and algorithmic matchmaking sites is threatening the future of
monogamy and that the titillation of ‘alternatives’ is rearing a generation of
sweethearts flitting from partner to partner. Maybe this is generally
characteristic behaviour across all techno-mediated divisions of society where
traditional, definitive cornerstones (commitment, concentration etc.) are being
flushed out by the immediacy of the medium.
Let’s
stick with the sex/relationships analogy shall we? Somewhere in the middle of
paragraph 4 I tore away from my desk and shuffled downstairs to brew my final
cup of tea for the evening. Flicking the TV on for some background noise I was
assaulted by Zeppelin, Floyd and the Beatles, retrieved once again from the BBC
archives in another one of those
way-back-when retrospectives; it was Danny
Baker’s Great Album Showdown. One of the segments consisted in Danny Baker,
Jeremy Clarkson and two others recalling the days when they would ‘support’
bands like football teams and listen to albums all the way through! What commitment! In all seriousness, whether
or not technology has impoverished monogamy, it has certainly sustained a
similar effect on music. Indeed, in my case, I see my relationship history
(with music) as a succession of flings and one night stands, with a couple of
exceptions. In all honesty, there is some bloody good music out there, but you
won’t find it in HMV. And so it is that I break with each of my fads with that
most palliative of gestures; “it’s not you, it’s me...and capitalism”.
Hamish Campbell-Legg is currently doing his Masters degree and is also the author of Lost in Pop Nation - the 'go to blog' for musical enthusiasts...
There are times when bad things just don’t go your way.The below article provides excellent information on how to prepare for a personal injury litigation.
ReplyDeletesendacardhome |
7thhome |
luxuryhomestogo |
myhavenhomes |
hailhomerepair |
mysincityhomes |
freehomedeposit |
freestonehomes |
hometownpenske |
homerunlotto |
One of this convention speeches and toasts is named Sorted out Homeschooler. Which i love to listen to fresh items individuals perform.
ReplyDeletewww.jennifergoodmanlinn.com |
www.jobsforcollegegradsonly.com |
www.jomaritravel.com |
www.journalistsforum.co.uk |
www.jpburnside.co.uk |
www.jukasastudiosofficialsite.com |
www.kellyllorennacd.co.uk |
www.kellysofnarberth.co.uk |
www.kerryfinnrealestate.com |
www.kickstartup.co.uk |
He argued that the increase in techno-mediated dating services and algorithmic matchmaking sites is threatening the future of monogamy and that the titillation of ‘alternatives’ is rearing a generation of sweethearts flitting from partner to partner.
ReplyDeletehr research paper :: research proposal writers at research paper town
V Tight Gel Review
ReplyDelete